Schaefer Research · Streaming Video · April 2026
Grocery Perspectives · Research Analysis

The most valuable audience in F&B advertising isn't watching your ads.

Streaming video viewers are the highest-income, most cooking-engaged, most premium-receptive grocery shoppers in our research. Here's who they are, what moves them to buy, and why most F&B brands haven't figured out how to reach them.

1,865
Respondents surveyed
$75–150K
Top household income bracket
68%
Practical decision drivers
40%
Balance cooking + convenience

01 — Who They Are

A profile built from 6,577 real grocery shoppers

This isn't modeled data. We surveyed 6,577 U.S. adults via a nationally representative, census-proportionate online panel. The 1,865 who identified streaming video as their primary weekly content medium look like this.

Streaming video F&B shopper analytics — CTV reach +28%, viewer composition, ad completion rate 75%, purchase intent lift +19%
Peak Age Cohort
35–54
Peak earning and household management years. Oldest skew of any non-TV segment.
Household Income
$75–150K
Highest income bracket of any media segment in our research. More purchasing power, higher quality threshold.
Children in Home
56%
Majority are household managers buying for more than themselves. Family context shapes every purchase.
Gender Split
54% F
Moderate female lean. More balanced than the social media audience — both decision-makers are present.
How They Shop
Primary store typeTraditional grocery
Top destinationsKroger · Trader Joe's · Costco
Secondary destinationSpecialty / natural grocers ↑
Monthly grocery spend$200–599
Shop frequencyWeekly (42%)
Online groceryHighest adoption of any segment
Store loyalty14% single-store — mostly multi-source
What They Buy
Top categoriesFresh Produce · Dairy · Proteins
Secondary categoriesFrozen · Beverages · Bakery · Pantry
Primary food roleBalance cooking + convenience
Scratch cooking indexHighest of any segment ↑
Trial driverQuality perception + recommendations
Per-trip spend$50–149 (wider range than social)
Discovery opennessModerate — deliberate, not impulsive
The strategic implication
This isn't a mass-market budget buyer. This is a household manager in their peak earning years, shopping at Trader Joe's and Whole Foods on the secondary trip, actively cooking from scratch, and making deliberate — not impulsive — quality decisions. That profile is worth more per conversion than almost any other segment in grocery media.

02 — Why People Buy

The motivation stack behind every purchase decision

Demographics tell you who's in the room. The Why People Buy Pyramid tells you what actually moves them. Streaming viewers have the most complex and premium-receptive motivation profile of any segment we studied.

Why People Buy — Pyramid
Aspirational
Identity ★
Emotional ★
Functional
Foundation
★ Strongest engagement layers for streaming audiences. These are where premium F&B messaging has the most leverage.
Tier 1 — Foundation

Taste + Freshness

Table stakes — but freshness and ingredient quality carry more weight here than in other segments. Non-negotiable entry point before anything else can land.

Tier 2 — Functional

Variety + Convenience + Value

Practical logic (68% overall influence) dominates. But "value" here isn't just price — it's quality-to-price ratio. Product variety and format options are functional differentiators.

Tier 3 — Emotional ★ Highest leverage
Streaming peak

Comfort + Nostalgia + Stress Relief

Comfort is the #1 emotional driver, but here it means ritual, occasion, and quality — not mood management. Meal occasion framing works. Warmth and care in the creative works. Aspirational framing doesn't.

Tier 4 — Identity ★ Strongest of any segment
Streaming peak

Wellness + Performance + Ethical Consumption

The most identity-engaged segment in the study. Wellness goals are active. Transparency, sourcing, and ethical consumption meaningfully influence brand choice — in ways they simply don't for social media or traditional TV audiences.

Tier 5 — Aspirational

Transparency + Supporting Local

The strongest aspirational engagement of any segment. Brands with a clear origin story, sourcing commitment, or community connection have a genuine edge here — this audience is actually listening for it.

03 — Channel Comparison

How streaming stacks up against every other channel

Streaming isn't just a different format. It's a fundamentally different audience. Here's how it compares across every dimension that matters for F&B advertisers — based on original Schaefer research across all three segments. Read all three reports →

Dimension
Social Media
Streaming Video
Traditional TV
Audience Income
Under $49K majority

Price-sensitive. Value ceiling on premium brands.

$75–150K top bracket

Highest purchasing power of any segment. Premium conversion is realistic.

Under $49K majority

Value-driven. Price messaging required.

Discovery Openness
High

62% discover new F&B brands via social. Fastest trial path.

Moderate

Deliberate, not impulsive. Open to quality-led new brands when messaging aligns.

Low

Familiarity-first. Wrong channel for brand introductions.

Premium Brand Fit
Cautious

Income gap creates conversion ceiling without value framing.

Strongest fit

Specialty grocers as secondary destination. Quality signals land. Ethical sourcing resonates.

Avoid

Price sensitivity and low self-expression won't carry premium positioning.

Scratch Cooking Index
Moderate

Balance + convenience, less scratch cooking than streaming.

Highest of any segment

Recipe-led, ingredient-focused creative resonates. Meal occasion framing works here and almost nowhere else.

Lowest

Familiarity and simplicity dominate. Recipe content won't land.

Identity / Ethics Engagement
Moderate

Mood/stress support angle works. Ethical consumption secondary.

Strongest of any segment

Transparency, sourcing, local support — all meaningfully present. Brand story earns trust here.

Very low (8%)

Self-expression barely registers. Identity and ethics messaging falls flat.

Online Grocery Adoption
Moderate / Growing

Social commerce emerging. Conversion path exists but not dominant.

Highest of any segment

Most digitally comfortable. Multi-surface conversion is realistic — streaming and online grocery can work together.

~1% — not a factor

Digital-only brands have no conversion path here.

Channel Targeting Complexity
Low — accessible

Meta's self-serve platform. Most F&B brands already here.

High — requires expertise

Fragmented across 10+ platforms. ACR targeting. This friction is why most brands haven't figured it out yet.

Medium — familiar

Linear TV buying is well-understood. But audience reach is declining YoY.

The Gap That Creates the Opportunity
Streaming has the best audience profile for premium F&B advertising of any channel we studied. It also has the highest planning complexity. Most brands default to Meta because it's easy to buy and to traditional TV because it's familiar to plan. Streaming falls in the gap between both — which is exactly why the competitive pressure is lower and the upside is real.

04 — Brand Fit

Which F&B brands streaming works best for

Not every brand belongs in streaming. The audience is specific, the income is real, and the motivation stack favors quality over price. Here's where the fit is strong, where it's conditional, and where it's a mismatch.

Strong Fit Primary channel
Who this is for

Premium and specialty F&B brands. Organic proteins, specialty dairy, functional beverages, premium sauces and condiments, artisan food brands — anything positioned above the mass-market price floor with a quality or provenance story to tell. See our F&B CPG services.

Why it works

The income is there. The specialty grocer affinity is there. The scratch cooking context is there. And the Identity tier engagement — where transparency and sourcing actually influence brand choice — is stronger here than in any other media segment.

Tactical note

Pair streaming media with distribution at Trader Joe's, Costco, Whole Foods, or Sprouts. The audience shops there. If your brand is Walmart-only, streaming is premature — solve distribution first.

Conditional Fit With the right message
Who this is for

Mid-market and functional F&B brands. Brands that aren't purely premium but have a clear quality angle, a health or wellness positioning, or a brand story that connects to how this audience thinks about food — cooking, ritual, real ingredients.

Why it's conditional

This audience is deliberate. Generic benefit claims, pure taste messaging, or value-forward creative won't cut through. The emotional and identity tiers need to be activated — see the Why People Buy Pyramid for how to frame this.

Tactical note

Test with recipe-led creative and ingredient provenance messaging first. If the story can't survive a 30-second streaming ad with those elements, the brief needs work before the media buys go live.

Poor Fit Spend elsewhere first
Who this is for

Value brands, challenger brands without distribution, and DTC-only brands. If your primary positioning is price, if your primary retail presence is Walmart or Dollar General, or if you don't have specialty retail distribution yet, streaming will underperform.

Why it doesn't work

This isn't a value-driven audience. Challenger brands need the discovery engine that social provides before they can earn the deliberate consideration this audience gives. Build social presence and specialty retail distribution first.

Tactical note

Streaming becomes the right channel when you have a brand story worth telling to an audience with the income to act on it. Use our buyer research process to confirm the story before scaling the channel.

05 — How to Reach Them

Five moves that work for streaming F&B campaigns

Based on the audience profile, the motivation stack, and how this segment actually shops — here's what the media strategy brief needs to contain before any streaming dollars go live. These principles inform how we approach channel strategy for every F&B client.

1
Match your retail footprint first
Streaming audiences shop at Trader Joe's, Costco, and Whole Foods — not primarily Walmart. Before you run a single streaming impression, make sure the brand has distribution at specialty or club retailers. Media investment that drives consideration without a shelf to convert to is money spent to confuse people.
2
Build creative around cooking occasions
40% of this audience balances cooking with convenience, and scratch cooking indexes higher here than any other segment. Recipe integration, meal occasion framing, and preparation context outperform generic product shots. The brief should answer: when in their week does this product belong, and what does that moment feel like? This is the core question our buyer research process is built to answer.
3
Put the sourcing story in the ad
Ethics, transparency, and ingredient provenance are active purchase drivers for this audience — not nice-to-haves on the website. If your brand has a real sourcing story, a farming relationship, a clean ingredient standard, or a local supply chain, that belongs in the 30-second creative. This is the one segment where brand story genuinely converts.
4
Use ACR data for contextual targeting
Automatic content recognition (ACR) lets you match ad delivery to viewing context — cooking shows, food-adjacent content, lifestyle programming. The streaming audience is already in a food mindset when that content is on. Contextual relevance pre-activates the emotional and identity layers before your ad even starts. Work with a DSP that has ACR inventory access.
5
Close the loop with digital grocery
This is the most digitally comfortable segment we studied — and the only one where online grocery adoption is meaningfully growing. A streaming ad that runs to an "add to cart at Instacart" or Walmart+ conversion pixel closes the loop between lean-back awareness and active purchase in a way that traditional TV simply can't. That full-funnel architecture is available. Most F&B brands haven't built it yet.

06 — The Bigger Picture

Why streaming is the right question to be asking now

This isn't a trend report. It's a snapshot of 1,865 real people, and what the data says about where premium F&B media is under-invested.

Streaming platforms: YouTube TV, Netflix, Paramount+, Max, Hulu, Prime Video, fubo, Apple TV+, Peacock
The friction argument

The reason most brands haven't figured out streaming isn't the audience. It's the buy.

Streaming is fragmented across Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video, Peacock, Max, Paramount+, Disney+, and a dozen others. There's no single buying surface the way Meta provides for social. ACR targeting requires DSP relationships most F&B brands don't have. Linear TV is easy to plan — everyone knows how. Streaming is not. That friction is the moat. The brands that invest in building streaming competency now will operate in less competitive space than almost anywhere else in paid media.

The research foundation

Most channel decisions in F&B are made without knowing who's actually watching.

Reach metrics, CPM comparisons, and platform-supplied audience estimates are all proxies. The research behind this page is different: we surveyed real grocery shoppers, isolated them by the media they actually spend the most time with, and mapped their purchase motivations from the ground up using the Why People Buy framework. That's the starting point for a channel strategy that works — not a media plan built backwards from a budget.

Social Media
The discovery engine

Lower income, high openness, comfort-driven. The fastest path from unknown to trial. Where challenger brands live and die. How we run Meta →

Streaming Video ★
The premium conversion play

Highest income, quality-conscious, deliberately bought. Where established premium brands compound their advantage — and where smart challengers with specialty distribution break through.

Traditional TV
The retention layer

Familiarity-locked, price-driven, habit-based. The right channel for brands that are already won — not for brands still trying to win.

07 — Related Research

Explore all three audience reports

All data on this page — and across all three reports — is from original, in-house primary research conducted by the Schaefer team. 6,577 U.S. adults. Nationally representative sample. No external data sources used for core findings. View the reports landing page →

Want this research applied to your brand?

We built this research to inform paid media strategy before spend begins. If you're a F&B brand trying to figure out where to put your media dollars — and why — that's exactly what we do.

Tell Us About Your Brand →
Seth Waite
Written by
Seth Waite
Partner & Chief Strategist · LinkedIn · Bio

Found this useful?

Share on LinkedIn