Streaming video viewers are the highest-income, most cooking-engaged, most premium-receptive grocery shoppers in our research. Here's who they are, what moves them to buy, and why most F&B brands haven't figured out how to reach them.
01 — Who They Are
This isn't modeled data. We surveyed 6,577 U.S. adults via a nationally representative, census-proportionate online panel. The 1,865 who identified streaming video as their primary weekly content medium look like this.
02 — Why People Buy
Demographics tell you who's in the room. The Why People Buy Pyramid tells you what actually moves them. Streaming viewers have the most complex and premium-receptive motivation profile of any segment we studied.
Table stakes — but freshness and ingredient quality carry more weight here than in other segments. Non-negotiable entry point before anything else can land.
Practical logic (68% overall influence) dominates. But "value" here isn't just price — it's quality-to-price ratio. Product variety and format options are functional differentiators.
Comfort is the #1 emotional driver, but here it means ritual, occasion, and quality — not mood management. Meal occasion framing works. Warmth and care in the creative works. Aspirational framing doesn't.
The most identity-engaged segment in the study. Wellness goals are active. Transparency, sourcing, and ethical consumption meaningfully influence brand choice — in ways they simply don't for social media or traditional TV audiences.
The strongest aspirational engagement of any segment. Brands with a clear origin story, sourcing commitment, or community connection have a genuine edge here — this audience is actually listening for it.
03 — Channel Comparison
Streaming isn't just a different format. It's a fundamentally different audience. Here's how it compares across every dimension that matters for F&B advertisers — based on original Schaefer research across all three segments. Read all three reports →
Price-sensitive. Value ceiling on premium brands.
Highest purchasing power of any segment. Premium conversion is realistic.
Value-driven. Price messaging required.
62% discover new F&B brands via social. Fastest trial path.
Deliberate, not impulsive. Open to quality-led new brands when messaging aligns.
Familiarity-first. Wrong channel for brand introductions.
Income gap creates conversion ceiling without value framing.
Specialty grocers as secondary destination. Quality signals land. Ethical sourcing resonates.
Price sensitivity and low self-expression won't carry premium positioning.
Balance + convenience, less scratch cooking than streaming.
Recipe-led, ingredient-focused creative resonates. Meal occasion framing works here and almost nowhere else.
Familiarity and simplicity dominate. Recipe content won't land.
Mood/stress support angle works. Ethical consumption secondary.
Transparency, sourcing, local support — all meaningfully present. Brand story earns trust here.
Self-expression barely registers. Identity and ethics messaging falls flat.
Social commerce emerging. Conversion path exists but not dominant.
Most digitally comfortable. Multi-surface conversion is realistic — streaming and online grocery can work together.
Digital-only brands have no conversion path here.
Meta's self-serve platform. Most F&B brands already here.
Fragmented across 10+ platforms. ACR targeting. This friction is why most brands haven't figured it out yet.
Linear TV buying is well-understood. But audience reach is declining YoY.
04 — Brand Fit
Not every brand belongs in streaming. The audience is specific, the income is real, and the motivation stack favors quality over price. Here's where the fit is strong, where it's conditional, and where it's a mismatch.
Premium and specialty F&B brands. Organic proteins, specialty dairy, functional beverages, premium sauces and condiments, artisan food brands — anything positioned above the mass-market price floor with a quality or provenance story to tell. See our F&B CPG services.
The income is there. The specialty grocer affinity is there. The scratch cooking context is there. And the Identity tier engagement — where transparency and sourcing actually influence brand choice — is stronger here than in any other media segment.
Pair streaming media with distribution at Trader Joe's, Costco, Whole Foods, or Sprouts. The audience shops there. If your brand is Walmart-only, streaming is premature — solve distribution first.
Mid-market and functional F&B brands. Brands that aren't purely premium but have a clear quality angle, a health or wellness positioning, or a brand story that connects to how this audience thinks about food — cooking, ritual, real ingredients.
This audience is deliberate. Generic benefit claims, pure taste messaging, or value-forward creative won't cut through. The emotional and identity tiers need to be activated — see the Why People Buy Pyramid for how to frame this.
Test with recipe-led creative and ingredient provenance messaging first. If the story can't survive a 30-second streaming ad with those elements, the brief needs work before the media buys go live.
Value brands, challenger brands without distribution, and DTC-only brands. If your primary positioning is price, if your primary retail presence is Walmart or Dollar General, or if you don't have specialty retail distribution yet, streaming will underperform.
This isn't a value-driven audience. Challenger brands need the discovery engine that social provides before they can earn the deliberate consideration this audience gives. Build social presence and specialty retail distribution first.
Streaming becomes the right channel when you have a brand story worth telling to an audience with the income to act on it. Use our buyer research process to confirm the story before scaling the channel.
05 — How to Reach Them
Based on the audience profile, the motivation stack, and how this segment actually shops — here's what the media strategy brief needs to contain before any streaming dollars go live. These principles inform how we approach channel strategy for every F&B client.
06 — The Bigger Picture
This isn't a trend report. It's a snapshot of 1,865 real people, and what the data says about where premium F&B media is under-invested.
Streaming is fragmented across Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video, Peacock, Max, Paramount+, Disney+, and a dozen others. There's no single buying surface the way Meta provides for social. ACR targeting requires DSP relationships most F&B brands don't have. Linear TV is easy to plan — everyone knows how. Streaming is not. That friction is the moat. The brands that invest in building streaming competency now will operate in less competitive space than almost anywhere else in paid media.
Reach metrics, CPM comparisons, and platform-supplied audience estimates are all proxies. The research behind this page is different: we surveyed real grocery shoppers, isolated them by the media they actually spend the most time with, and mapped their purchase motivations from the ground up using the Why People Buy framework. That's the starting point for a channel strategy that works — not a media plan built backwards from a budget.
Lower income, high openness, comfort-driven. The fastest path from unknown to trial. Where challenger brands live and die. How we run Meta →
Highest income, quality-conscious, deliberately bought. Where established premium brands compound their advantage — and where smart challengers with specialty distribution break through.
Familiarity-locked, price-driven, habit-based. The right channel for brands that are already won — not for brands still trying to win.
07 — Related Research
All data on this page — and across all three reports — is from original, in-house primary research conducted by the Schaefer team. 6,577 U.S. adults. Nationally representative sample. No external data sources used for core findings. View the reports landing page →
We built this research to inform paid media strategy before spend begins. If you're a F&B brand trying to figure out where to put your media dollars — and why — that's exactly what we do.
Found this useful?
Share on LinkedIn