Context
What's instructive about Hires isn't the recipe. It's that he solved a problem that every beverage brand faces today and most misname.
The problem isn't product formulation, distribution, or even taste. It's permission — giving the buyer a story about themselves that makes the purchase feel like self-expression rather than indulgence, virtue rather than vice, identity rather than transaction.
Hires figured that out in an era before focus groups, before behavioral economics had a name, before anyone had written down the concept of a "job to be done." He did it by reading his culture precisely and building a brand architecture — not a product — that met the buyer exactly where their anxiety lived.
The market he entered had three drinking realities: water of dubious safety, milk that spoiled within hours, and beer that was both cheap and culturally dominant. The Women's Christian Temperance Union was at its political peak. Urbanization was concentrating populations into newspaper-reading, magazine-subscribing consumers for the first time.
What Hires saw wasn't a product gap. It was a social gap. Millions of people wanted the ritual of having a drink — the release, the gathering, the sensory pleasure — but were caught between two forces. Industrial-era pressure toward moral rectitude on one side. The deeply human need for pleasure and pause on the other.
Buyer Psychology
Understanding why the Hires brand worked requires going one level deeper than the advertising itself. It requires understanding what the product was actually for — which was never, at its core, refreshment. The purchase of Hires Root Beer was a performance of identity.
Go-to-Market Architecture
The four levers explain why buyers wanted Hires. These three structural decisions explain why competitors couldn't replicate him.
Hires sold the home extract kit (makes 5 gallons), the bottled ready-to-drink, and the soda-fountain pour. The extract was particularly brilliant: it turned customers into co-manufacturers and ambassadors. When you made root beer at home from a Hires extract, you weren't just a consumer. You were a participant in the brand.
$200,000 in three months in 1893 — roughly $7M+ today — when the entire soft-drink category was a rounding error. The analogy holds for modern brands: advertising isn't just demand generation, it's proof of confidence. A brand that spends visibly is a brand that believes it will survive. That signal of permanence is part of what the buyer is buying.
Estimated figures. Hires 1893 based on reported $200K/quarter vs. estimated revenue. Modern brands estimated from public filings and reported data.
Trade cards, joke books, puzzle books, pen knives, pocket mirrors, Maxfield Parrish-illustrated magazine spreads. Each piece was useful, collectible, or shareable — a physical content marketing engine where the consumer carried the brand into their home and pocket.
The lesson isn't "do content marketing." It's that the form of the content should match the rhythm of the buyer's life. Hires gave people things they wanted to keep. The brand traveled with the object.
Cautionary Note
By the 1920s, Prohibition removed Hires' core wedge. The temperance positioning lost its meaning when beer itself was illegal — there was no longer a cultural binary to straddle, no moral credit to be earned by choosing root beer over alcohol.
The Hires Boy started reading as too domestic, too juvenile for a Jazz Age audience drifting toward Coca-Cola's urbanity. The brand pivoted to flappers and glamorous couples, but the strategic identity had been built on a cultural antagonist that no longer existed.
The modern analogue is closer than most brands want to admit. Brands positioned purely against "Big Soda" or "Big Alcohol" risk the same fate if the incumbents reformulate — which they're already doing. Coke has acquired functional brands. AB-InBev owns the NA beer leaders. When the enemy cleans up its act, "better than them" stops being a differentiator.
Applied Framework
The current functional-soda war between Olipop and Poppi is, structurally, the Hires playbook re-run with better fermentation science. Olipop's "a new kind of soda" with prebiotics for gut health is Hires' "pure food temperance drink" with different vocabulary. Poppi's lifestyle-and-community play is the Hires Boy translated into TikTok.
| Brand | Permission Frame | Health Halo | Social Proof Lever | Identity Anchor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hires (1876) | Beer ritual without moral cost | Pure food, nerve force, vitality | 3.1M packages sold; "every American" | Respectable family person |
| Olipop | Soda without the guilt | Prebiotics, clinical gut health trials | Retail velocity, sold-out claims | Health-conscious nostalgia seeker |
| Poppi | Fun soda, redefined | Apple cider vinegar, prebiotic fiber | TikTok virality, Super Bowl ad | Trendy wellness community |
| Athletic Brewing | Beer ritual, no alcohol | Lower calories, better mornings | Racing sponsorships, athlete endorsers | Performance-focused adult |
| Liquid Death | Heavy metal water (absurdist) | Hydration, electrolytes | Can count, skate/music community | Anti-establishment rebel |
Five transferable lessons
The Summary Line Worth Keeping
The core insight is still the right one: people don't buy beverages. They buy permission to be a certain kind of person. The health claim is the permission slip. The flavor is the delivery. The brand is the community that confirms the choice was right.
Every beverage brand that has mattered since — Coke's "happiness," Red Bull's "wings," Liquid Death's anti-establishment posture, Olipop's gut-health permission, Athletic's sober adulthood — is running a variation of that same structural play. Hires figured it out at a Centennial Exposition with a paper packet of root extract. We're still catching up.
Sources
Lower Merion Historical Society · Philadelphia Yearly Meeting · MSU Campus Archaeology · Library Company of Philadelphia · Tredyffrin Easttown Historical Society · Bay Bottles · Vintage Recipe Blog · London Middlebury